Year-End Prediction and Videos

For the last post of 2010 I thought I’d make a safe prediction and point to a couple of good financial videos.

Prediction: In 2011, blogs and other media will be filled with reasons for why current conditions for different asset classes are different this time, but they will be wrong. The best ways to approach investing over the long term will continue to be the best ways into the future.

In his latest newsletter, Ken Kivenko included a couple of interesting videos. The first is a short funny video about mutual funds and the second is a clear explanation of what you’re up against when trying to beat the market.

Have a fun and safe New Year’s Eve.

Comments

  1. RobertDecember 31, 2010 at 7:40 AM

    According to the second video, Wall Street can't beat the market and no mutuals funds beat the market. But the market is just the aggregate of Wall Street (including mutual funds) and ... who? Private investors? Since the "market" is an average and all of Wall Street is below average, someone has to be above average in order to create the average. Does that mean private investors are all beating the market?

    I really dislike the type of oversimplification presented in that video. First, this type of presentation doesn't question the assumption that everyone's trying to beat the market. It's a straw man argument. Since the market is an average, not everyone can beat it (and not everyone can lag it). Not everyone is trying to beat the market. Some people are investing for income. Others are investing for long-term inflation protection. Others own shares through corporate sponsored share purchase plans. Hedge funds, as an example, (that use a hedging strategy) don't mind underperforming the market some years, as long as they can return a steady 5% over inflation.

    What the argument comes down to, most often, is "you could save money by ditching your advisor." That's fine for some (maybe most) people, but there are people who don't mind paying to have their hand held and there are people who could buying an index, but want help choosing which index. Advisors shouldn't ever promise to beat the market. But if they can write a realistic financial plan and help a client achieve their goals, that's worth the price.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michael JamesDecember 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM

    @Robert: Wall Street is only below average because of the fees it charges. Before fees, Wall Street is roughly average. So there is no need for private investors (or anyone else) to be above average to "create the average".

    I don't believe that the video oversimplified the situation. Focusing on stocks only, there are index investors who aren't trying to beat the market and it is true that there are other investors focused on income. However, the dominant factor is the great many players who are trying to beat the market. Their presence causes the prices of these income-producing stocks to be efficient. All evidence says that collectively those trying to beat the market just match the market before fees. After all fees, commissions, etc., they lag the market.

    Most people would do well to get advice from a good fee-only advisor. Unfortunately, most people can't distinguish between a good advisor and the thundering herd of mutual fund salespeople. Anyone who can make this distinction can probably just pick his or her own indexes without help.

    ReplyDelete
  3. geneJanuary 2, 2011 at 10:51 PM

    Look for a good year for US equities. The third year in the presidential election cycle is traditionally good for the market. I think on average, returns are in the 20% range.

    Interesting statistic, though I don't consider it especially predictive. When it comes to the stock market I don't think of much as being particularly predictive.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michael JamesJanuary 2, 2011 at 11:09 PM

    @Gene: I don't put much faith in presidential cycle patterns, but cosmology tells us that stock markets on earth aren't likely to do very well once the sun burns through enough fuel that it expands into a red giant. I call this the "year 5 billion problem".

    ReplyDelete
  5. geneJanuary 3, 2011 at 12:48 AM

    Thank you for sharing your theory. I would like to subscribe to your Y5B newsletter. I think we'd better put a DNA library on a space craft and send it to a more promising solar system.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Short Takes: InvestorLine’s HISAs, 24-Hour Trading, and more

I recently moved some cash into BMO InvestorLine’s high-interest savings accounts (HISAs) that are structured as mutual funds.  Their designations are BMT104, BMT109, and BMT114, and they purportedly pay 4.35% annual interest (which they can change whenever they like).  However, the way they report the monthly interest payments is so baffling that I wasn’t able to sort it out in my first 15 minutes of trying.  A further complication is the following text in the HISA description: “The Bank may pay, monthly or quarterly, compensation to your Dealer at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the daily closing balance in the BMO HISA.”  I couldn’t find any evidence of such a charge, but I haven’t been invested for a full quarter, and I can’t yet say that such a charge isn’t buried somehow in the confusing reporting.  I have more digging to do before I can recommend these HISAs. Here are some short takes and some weekend reading: Preet Banerjee explains the dangers of Robi...
Read more

My Asset Allocation

I’ve resisted discussing my asset allocation for some time, but now is finally the time to describe it and the reasons behind it. I’m not holding it out as a model portfolio; I believe it’s suitable for me and not necessarily anyone else. With that warning, enjoy the discussion and feel free to ask questions or take some pot-shots. The main reason why I haven’t discussed my asset allocation in detail before now is that I don’t want readers to treat it like a model portfolio and follow it blindly. Everyone’s situation is different. The need for variation in asset allocation from one investor to the next usually isn’t huge, but there is no one-size-fits-all portfolio. A secondary reason for keeping my asset allocation to myself is that I can’t be sure I’ll never change it. For example, I recently made the minor change of switching from an ETF of small-cap stocks to an ETF of small-cap value stocks . I don’t have any plans to change my current allocation, but I may think differe...
Read more

Updated Currency Exchange Method at BMO InvestorLine

There is now a more recent update of the method I use for exchanging currency at BMO OnvestorLine . I recently changed the procedure I use to convert large sums between Canadian and U.S. dollars at BMO InvestorLine. The method I use saves a lot of money compared to using the InvestorLine foreign exchange system. The latest change I made eliminated an annoying interest charge that I had to ask to be reversed. Most people don’t realize how expensive it can be to exchange currency. The extra charge banks and brokerages add gets hidden in the exchange rate. To see this extra charge, start by taking a sum in Canadian dollars, say C$10,000, and finding out how many U.S. dollars you can get. Then see what this U.S. amount would get going back to Canadian dollars. Many people might guess they’d get their original C$10,000 back, but they’d be wrong. In a recent test I did at BMO InvestorLine, I’d get back C$9754, for a loss of C$246 in two currency exchanges. That’s $123 per excha...
Read more

Archive

Show more