1. Preet gives us a credit card payoff calculator. Hopefully this will inspire people to pay off their high-interest debt and not cause them to give up because it will take too long.
I recently moved some cash into BMO InvestorLine’s high-interest savings accounts (HISAs) that are structured as mutual funds. Their designations are BMT104, BMT109, and BMT114, and they purportedly pay 4.35% annual interest (which they can change whenever they like). However, the way they report the monthly interest payments is so baffling that I wasn’t able to sort it out in my first 15 minutes of trying. A further complication is the following text in the HISA description: “The Bank may pay, monthly or quarterly, compensation to your Dealer at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the daily closing balance in the BMO HISA.” I couldn’t find any evidence of such a charge, but I haven’t been invested for a full quarter, and I can’t yet say that such a charge isn’t buried somehow in the confusing reporting. I have more digging to do before I can recommend these HISAs. Here are some short takes and some weekend reading: Preet Banerjee explains the dangers of Robi...
Inflation is a risk we have to face in financial planning, particularly in retirement. We need to measure inflation risk correctly to be able to make reasonable financial plans. The best guide we have to the future takes into account past inflation statistics. But the field of statistics is full of subtleties, and even Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) can make mistakes. DFA creates good funds, and their advisors tend to do good work for their clients. I’d prefer to find errors in the work of a less investor-friendly investment firm, but they provided a clear example to learn from. They misapplied a statistical rule, and as a result, they misinterpreted the history of inflation over the past century. I discussed this issue with Larry Swedroe in posts on X. I respect Larry and have followed his work as he tirelessly explains evidence based investing to the masses. A Simple Example To explain the problem, let’s first begin with a simpler example. So...
I’ve resisted discussing my asset allocation for some time, but now is finally the time to describe it and the reasons behind it. I’m not holding it out as a model portfolio; I believe it’s suitable for me and not necessarily anyone else. With that warning, enjoy the discussion and feel free to ask questions or take some pot-shots. The main reason why I haven’t discussed my asset allocation in detail before now is that I don’t want readers to treat it like a model portfolio and follow it blindly. Everyone’s situation is different. The need for variation in asset allocation from one investor to the next usually isn’t huge, but there is no one-size-fits-all portfolio. A secondary reason for keeping my asset allocation to myself is that I can’t be sure I’ll never change it. For example, I recently made the minor change of switching from an ETF of small-cap stocks to an ETF of small-cap value stocks . I don’t have any plans to change my current allocation, but I may think differe...
Thanks for the mention, have a superior fin de semaine.
ReplyDeleteCC: Thanks for including me in your list. I almost didn't recognize your picture -- you're almost always smiling in person :-)
ReplyDeleteThicken: Thanks for the vote. I count your blog among the more thoughtful and useful blogs as well.
Thanks for the link Michael and congrats on the G&M coverage!
ReplyDeleteCongrats on the Globe and Mail mention.
ReplyDeleteI'll be reading that book as well.
Thanks for the link Michael - you got my vote in the poll. Have a great weekend!
ReplyDelete