Common advice about controlling spending is to track all your purchases and add them up each week or month. I believe that this is effective, but have been fuzzy on why it seems to work so well. Why can’t people just spend less without the constant reminder of how well they are doing? I got some insight on this question from, of all places, poker. For poker players there is a certain thrill to dragging in a pot of chips. The thrill is there whether it is a $1 pot or a $10 pot. The $10 pot gives a bigger thrill, but not 10 times bigger. Similarly, losing a $10 pot feels worse than losing a $1 pot, but not 10 times worse. This leads to some players playing in such a way that they maximize happiness by taking in many small pots, but losing some big ones. As long as they don’t count their dwindling chips, they can actually be happy playing this way. Counting your chips is a lot like adding up your spending at the end of the month to see what happened. You may feel good about ...
I view this year as a year where I got to buy lots of bargains from my Dividend Reinvestments and a year where I finally won a few pool games, so not that bad a year too!
ReplyDeleteHOPPY NUDES YARD!
'Stocks will rebound in a big way in 2009' Michael James on Money.
ReplyDeleteI am holding your to that prediction and I will be angry at you if it does not come to fruition :)
Happy New Year, I enjoyed your blog in 2008, keep it up!