The Market Portfolio

In his book, The Intelligent Portfolio, Christopher L. Jones discusses the average portfolio at great length. This average portfolio is also called the “market portfolio,” and it consists of every class of asset in the proportion that it exists in the marketplace. Jones attributes many qualities to this portfolio, but it has its limitations.

Jones gives a table of how much money is in each type of asset (e.g., cash, various types of bonds, different classes of stock, etc.). If you believe in the market portfolio, then you should buy into each asset class in these proportions.

Jones justifies this saying “when it comes to predicting the future, the market is usually smarter than any one person.” However, he exposes the problem with his reasoning when he says that the market portfolio “represents an efficient allocation of asset classes for an investor with an average tolerance for risk.” What if your tolerance for risk isn’t average?

The perfect airplane seat is only perfect for the average size person. No matter how hard you try to make this seat perfect, it still won’t work well for the shortest gymnast or the tallest basketball player. Few of us have exactly the average tolerance for risk, and therefore few of us would find the market portfolio to be optimal.

For next week’s grocery money, you should stick with cash because the market portfolio is far too risky. But, is the market portfolio suitable for long-term savings? No, because it is too conservative.

The market portfolio consists of all assets including people’s grocery money, retirement savings, and everything in between. Even much of the retirement savings is controlled by pension plans that give strong incentives to their managers to be conservative. A money manager who gets modest, but steady results gets to keep his job.

Overall, the market portfolio is more conservative than necessary for retirement savings. It’s conceivable that given your mix of short-term and long-term investing needs, the market portfolio fits you well. But, it is best to make sensible choices with your grocery money and retirement savings separately instead of blindly following the pack.

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 18, 2008 at 10:28 AM

    Unfortunately the market portfolio can contain some unconventional asset classes such as "housing you can't actually afford and will lose soon". I don't think I'll copy the "average" person.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michael JamesAugust 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM

    Richard: (chuckle) Good one. You'd probably do well to avoid buying your share of lottery tickets as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Short Takes: InvestorLine’s HISAs, 24-Hour Trading, and more

I recently moved some cash into BMO InvestorLine’s high-interest savings accounts (HISAs) that are structured as mutual funds.  Their designations are BMT104, BMT109, and BMT114, and they purportedly pay 4.35% annual interest (which they can change whenever they like).  However, the way they report the monthly interest payments is so baffling that I wasn’t able to sort it out in my first 15 minutes of trying.  A further complication is the following text in the HISA description: “The Bank may pay, monthly or quarterly, compensation to your Dealer at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the daily closing balance in the BMO HISA.”  I couldn’t find any evidence of such a charge, but I haven’t been invested for a full quarter, and I can’t yet say that such a charge isn’t buried somehow in the confusing reporting.  I have more digging to do before I can recommend these HISAs. Here are some short takes and some weekend reading: Preet Banerjee explains the dangers of Robi...
Read more

My Asset Allocation

I’ve resisted discussing my asset allocation for some time, but now is finally the time to describe it and the reasons behind it. I’m not holding it out as a model portfolio; I believe it’s suitable for me and not necessarily anyone else. With that warning, enjoy the discussion and feel free to ask questions or take some pot-shots. The main reason why I haven’t discussed my asset allocation in detail before now is that I don’t want readers to treat it like a model portfolio and follow it blindly. Everyone’s situation is different. The need for variation in asset allocation from one investor to the next usually isn’t huge, but there is no one-size-fits-all portfolio. A secondary reason for keeping my asset allocation to myself is that I can’t be sure I’ll never change it. For example, I recently made the minor change of switching from an ETF of small-cap stocks to an ETF of small-cap value stocks . I don’t have any plans to change my current allocation, but I may think differe...
Read more

Updated Currency Exchange Method at BMO InvestorLine

There is now a more recent update of the method I use for exchanging currency at BMO OnvestorLine . I recently changed the procedure I use to convert large sums between Canadian and U.S. dollars at BMO InvestorLine. The method I use saves a lot of money compared to using the InvestorLine foreign exchange system. The latest change I made eliminated an annoying interest charge that I had to ask to be reversed. Most people don’t realize how expensive it can be to exchange currency. The extra charge banks and brokerages add gets hidden in the exchange rate. To see this extra charge, start by taking a sum in Canadian dollars, say C$10,000, and finding out how many U.S. dollars you can get. Then see what this U.S. amount would get going back to Canadian dollars. Many people might guess they’d get their original C$10,000 back, but they’d be wrong. In a recent test I did at BMO InvestorLine, I’d get back C$9754, for a loss of C$246 in two currency exchanges. That’s $123 per excha...
Read more

Archive

Show more